
Currently, a pair of bills are being considered in the United States Senate and House of Representatives, S. 1461 and H.R. 1639, the Traditional Cigar Manufacturing and Small Business Jobs Preservation Act of 2011, that would spare premium handmade cigars from FDA oversight. Cigar Rights of America, the leading cigar consumer advocacy group, has suggested that if premium handmade cigars fall under the FDA’s control, a slew of changes could hit and devastate the industry.
Among the possible scenarios that CRA suggests could become realities are:.
A ban on walk-in humidors, as found in Canada, as well as banning self-service displays and online or mail-order of cigars.
· Limits on advertising and promotions, including banning cigar sampling/tasting events.
· Banning logoed cigar merchandise such as hats, t-shirts and jackets.
· Banning the use of the word cigar or tobacco.
· Manufacturers having to submit blends to the FDA for ‘testing’ before being allowed to be sold at retail.
· Adverse impacts on flavored tobacco products.
· Defacing of cigar boxes and their often intricate artwork with grotesque, graphic images.
· Price increases due to new fees on manufacturers, as well as ‘user fees’ on consumers to finance FDA regulation.
H.R. 1639 currently has 135 co-sponsors from states across the country, while S. 1461 has received support from four senators, including bipartisan support from Florida’s Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson.
Each of Arizona’s eight U.S. Representatives and both of the state’s U.S. Senators were asked to comment on these two bills and asked whether or not they would be supporting the bill being proposed in their chamber of Congress to exempt premium handmade cigars from FDA oversight and protect cigar smokers’ rights.
Only two of the state’s eight representatives provided responses through their spokespeople.
Adam Sarvana, communications director for Rep. Raul Grijalva, said that “Rep. Grijalva voted for the Tobacco Control Act and feels it’s the best way to handle tobacco sales and marketing. Nothing has changed his mind since that vote.”
Grijalva’s 7th Congressional District is the second largest in the state, covering 22,872 square miles, including a large portion of Tucson, while extending west to the California border and south to the Mexican border.
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who represents the southeast corner of Arizona, including a portion of Tucson, in the state’s 8th Congressional District, has not returned to work following the Jan 8, 2011 shooting at a public event that left her fighting for her life. She is currently in Houston working full-time on her therapy and recovery, according to Mark Kimble, Rep. Giffords’ senior press advisor.
Both Giffords and Grijalva were co-sponsors of the Tobacco Control Act of 2009, with Giffords voting for the bill while Grijalva did not vote on it.
Among the other six representatives, spokespeople for two of them acknowledged the request for comment but weren’t able to actually provide one.
Rep. Ed Pastor of Arizona’s 4th Congressional District that covers South and Central Phoenix as well as portions of Glendale and Guadalupe, didn’t provide a comment, though his press secretary, Maura Cordova, said she would “keep trying.” Pastor voted for the Tobacco Control Act in 2009.
Genevieve Rozansky, press secretary for Rep. Jeff Flake, said that “the Congressman is looking into this matter,” but left it at that. Flake represents the 6th Congressional District, which covers parts of Mesa and Chandler, as well as all of Gilbert, Queen Creek and Apache Junction, an area home to several cigar stores. Flake opposed the Tobacco Control Act.
Which leaves four U.S. Representatives – Paul Gosar of District 1, Trent Franks of District 2, Ben Quayle of District 3 and David Schweikert of District 5 who failed to supply any comment on the matter – or even an acknowledgment of the request.
Franks was the only representative in office in 2009 when the Tobacco Control Act came up for a vote – he voted no on the proposal. Ann Kirkpatrick and John Shadegg, who represented Districts 1 and 3 respectively, each voted no, while Harry Mitchell, who represented District 5 at the time, voted yes.
Unfortunately for cigar smokers, some of these districts contain a number of cigar stores. District 5 is home to numerous cigars stores in Scottsdale,Tempe and Ahwatukee, while District 3 covers a significant portion of Central Phoenix, Scottsdale and Cave Creek.
As for Arizona’s two U.S. Senators?
Neither Senator John McCain nor Senator Jon Kyl, both Republicans, responded to a request for comment. Neither was a co-sponsor of S. 982, the Senate’s version of the Tobacco Control Act from 2009, though Sen. McCain voted for it while Sen. Kyl voted against it.
Be wary Arizonans – the elected officials who could be representing your cigar rights and freedoms are not only not doing so, several of them can’t be bothered to explain why they don’t care about your freedom to enjoy a perfectly legal product without government interference and regulation.
Concerned cigar smokers who want to protect their freedom to enjoy a cigar are encouraged to contact their elected officials and request that they support S. 1461 and H.R. 1639. While a printed and hand-signed letter sent through the mail is most effective, Cigar Rights of America has made it possible to send an e-mail in a matter of moments, simply by filling out your name and address.
Make no mistake about it – your ability to smoke a cigar in both Arizona and the United States are coming under direct attack, and it will be up to your elected officials to keep the FDA’s hands off your cigars. If you value your freedoms and rights to enjoy a cigar, the time to act is now.