Posts Tagged ‘cigarettes promotion’

State sues tobacco shop over cigarette-making machines

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

CONCORD – The state of New Hampshire is suing a Brookline businessman who is charging customers $20 for a carton of cigarettes they roll themselves.

According to Assistant Attorney General David Rienzo, Joseph Correia Jr. of Tobacco Haven in Brookline has two machines customers use to make their own cigarettes. Customers buy tobacco and other cigarette components and then are directed to the machines and taught how to operate them, according to Rienzo.

Each machine can churn out about 200 cigarettes — a carton — in about 10 minutes. Customers pay $26 a carton, about $30 less than the going price of a pre-packaged carton.

Atty. Jeffrey Burd of Cincinnati, Ohio, who represents Correia, said Tobacco Haven disputes it is a manufacturer.

“We have communicated that to the Attorney General’s Office prior to the filing of this lawsuit,” he said. “They disagreed.”

Burd said he will be filing paperwork with the court outlining Tobacco Haven’s position prior to an Oct. 13 hearing in Merrimack County Superior Court.

Rienzo said the state is owed about 2 cents per cigarette under the state’s Non-Participating Manufacturers and the Directory Act. Additionally, taxes of $1.33 per pack have gone uncollected, according to Rienzo.

“There’s a big issue on taxes,” he said.

While the state Department of Revenues is aware of the situation, Rienzo said the tax issue is not part of the lawsuit filed in Merrimack County Superior Court.

Eleven years ago, state laws were enacted as part of the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) of 1998.The MSA holds tobacco manufacturers responsible for the costs paid by the state for Medicaid patients suffering from tobacco-related illnesses. As a result, the state receives $50 million annually.

Those manufacturers who are part of the settlement increased their prices to cover the annual $7 billion payment to all 50 states, Rienzo said.

Under state law, cigarette manufacturers have to join the MSA but those who do not must pay into an escrow account which is maintained in the event the states decide to sue them as well. The amount paid is based on the number of cigarettes made – about two-cents per butt, according to Rienzo.

The state is asking a judge to declare Tobacco Haven a tobacco products manufacturer, making it subject to state laws.Part of the MSA agreement, Rienzo explained, obligates the state to go after those manufacturers who do not pay into the escrow account. He said it would be costly for the state not to enforce those laws because if it doesn’t, the penalty is the loss of that annual $50 million payment.

Rienzo did not know how many cigarettes were manufactured at Tobacco Haven or how much money is due the state.

© Aug. 19, 2009 Unionleader

International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Convene in New Orleans August 8-1

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

WHAT: 77th Annual Convention & International Trade Show
International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Association (IPCPR)
WHERE: New Orleans Morial Convention Center (NOMCC)
WHEN: Saturday, August 8 – Wednesday, August 12, 2009

WHY: The IPCPR represents thousands of small business owners of smoke shops and manufacturers of premium, handmade cigars across the United States. IPCPR members generate tens of thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in federal, state and local sales and payroll taxes. Premium cigars are enjoyed with friends like fine wines. They make ordinary occasions special and special occasions extraordinary. With every tax increase on tobacco products and with every legislated smoking ban at local, state or national levels, those jobs and tax revenues are increasingly threatened, not to mention the chipping away of our individual rights.
DETAILS: The 77th Annual Convention & International Trade Show of the International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Association (IPCPR) is the largest premium tobacco trade show in the world. The event is open only to members and guests of IPCPR. It is not open to the public.
The show features more than 300 exhibitors and more than 1,300 booths displaying, demonstrating, sampling and wholesaling new and traditional tobacco products and accessories exclusively for the 5,500 attendees who come from throughout the U.S. and 30 foreign countries to stimulate New Orleans’ economy with some $12 million in local expenditures.
Members of IPCPR include more than 2,000 premium cigar retailers, manufacturers and distributors of high-quality, hand-made cigars, pipes, premium tobacco and related accoutrements. Services of IPCPR provided to its members include legislative and marketing support such as the annual convention and trade show being staged in New Orleans this year.
For the most part, IPCPR members are small, family-owned businesses participating in the less than five percent of the tobacco market which is comprised of tobacco products other than cigarettes, which represent the remaining 95 percent.
The IPCPR staged last year’s show in Las Vegas and has already indicated that it expects to return to New Orleans for its 78th annual show next year.
Local media are welcome and encouraged to cover this important event but will not be permitted to walk the floor or attend events unescorted or without credentials.
For credentials and to discuss potential interview and photo opportunities, please contact IPCPR’s public relations agency, Tortorici & Randolph (see below), for specific times.
SCHEDULE:
Saturday, August 8
12:30pm – 2:00pm Seminar 1 – Cigar Rights of America
J. Glynn Loope, Executive Director
2:15pm – 3:45pm Seminar 2 – Tobacconist University
Jorge Armenteros, President & Founder
4:00pm – 5:30pm Seminar 3 – Legislative Update
Chris McCalla, IPCPR Legislative Director
6:30pm – 8:00pm IPCPR Opening Reception (No Media)
Sunday, August 9
8:00am – 10:00am Opening Breakfast and IPCPR Annual Meeting
10:00am – 5:00pm Trade Show Open
6:30pm – 8:00pm Private Reception (No Media)
Monday, August 10 & Tuesday, August 11
10:00am – 5:00pm Trade Show Open
Wednesday, August 12
9:00am – 1:00pm Trade Show Open

WEB SITES: www.ipcpr.org,

Media Contacts:
Tortorici & Randolph (for IPCPR)
Tony Tortorici, 678/697-3069 (cell), tony@tortoricipr.com

‘Cabaret CooCoo’: Cigars, Cigarettes, Candy?

Friday, July 17th, 2009

The leggy cigarette girls are your first clue to the throwback aura of Cabaret CooCoo, a gentle exercise in vaudeville pluck by the locally based Happenstance Theater. Before the show starts, women stroll the aisles selling items you can’t actually consume in the low-ceilinged auditorium at Mt. Vernon Place United Methodist Church (Fringe calls this venue The Mountain), while two musicians plink out cute old tunes on accordion and ukulele.

It’s awfully winsome, so delicate you fear it might fall apart. By design, these yesteryear troupers barely have their act together: the headliners haven’t arrived, the master of ceremonies disappears, and heck, nobody’s even manning the spotlight. (When someone finally gets to it, the beam keeps hitting the wrong spot.)

Time for a wing and a prayer, right? Surely this charming band of entertainers has a little something up its collective sleeve.

Well, yes and no. Yes: the Gracie Allen quality of Sabrina Mandell as Diz Aster, who sings plaintively yet winningly with Izzy Aster (Mandell’s real-life husband, Mark Jaster). The duo discovers neat opportunities for subtle slapstick in the midst of standards like “Bicycle Built for Two,” and Jaster — a gifted physical clown — graciously cedes the spotlight to Mandell’s adorably kooky persona.

The music is simple and childlike; a toy piano played by Nick Newlin suits the mood perfectly. Newlin even turns out to be a surprisingly deft juggler, if not quite ready for a big-time Cirque gig.

Less effective, though not way off the mark, is a swinging dance routine by the cigarette girls that practically blossoms into ballet. Also sketchy is the rudimentary sleight of hand by Karen Beriss, as well as the overall timing of what Happenstance intends as an endearing night of comic misfires and schlepping through.

The group had a Fringe hit last year with “Low Tide Hotel,” and it’s booked for a holiday show this December at Bethesda’s Round House Theatre. But the members are still honing this bit of old-school stuff; performed by Happenstance, the acts are perpetually young at heart.

Electronic Cigarette Support On, Despite Attacks

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

The special interest group battle against the products known as electronic cigarettes shows no sign of ending anytime soon, even though there has been an answer for each and every concern that has been raised about the products. From the concerns about different flavors attracting children to whether a smoker has the right to a safer smoking alternative, answers from the industry and from those who use the products have flooded the internet.

“All these people who keep saying that e-cigarettes with flavors will be used to attract children to the habit are just blowing smoke. When I take a berry-flavored Pepcid for heartburn, my kids don’t want one,” says Robin, an e-cigarette user from Tennessee. “Nobody knows whether those energy drinks or energy shots are good for you, either… why aren’t they going after them?”

The claim that other flavored items could also be being marketed to children could be a valid one, according to one e-cigarette affiliate.

“If they want to claim our products are being marketed to children on the basis of having flavors, there are aisles of OTC medicines and flavored energy drinks, sodas, and alcohols that fall into that same category,” says George Archer, Public Relations Manager for Electroniccigarettesusa.info. “Not only that, but look at McDonald’s… kids are growing up on McDonald’s food, but no one wants to outlaw McDonald’s, even though there is no end in sight to the child obesity problem in this country.”

Another argument against e-cigarettes is that the FDA has no regulations in place concerning the products, but e-cigarette users and retailers cry foul because of the lack of regulations on other products that are known to be dangerous and have been on the market for years. Not much information exists on the health effects of energy drinks or the concentrated versions called “energy shots”, but it has been noted that some are marketed on low shelves at checkout counters of department stores nationwide.

E-cigarette use and advocacy is on the rise, despite the FDA blocking foreign shipments from entering the country earlier this year. The product is a touchy subject for many people and the controversy doesn’t seem to be going away anytime soon.

Taiwan’s Take on Traditional Japan

Sunday, June 21st, 2009

Down a long, narrow road lined with fishing ponds, small groups of fishermen ply the waters with their poles, which droop at an angle nearly parallel to their dangling cigarettes. Nestled in the countryside 20 minutes outside Taipei is Tsubaki, the type of small, upscale inn that in Japan is called a ryokan. Pass through the old wooden gate, and you might as well be in Kyoto.

Surrounded by a densely wooded hill, Tsubaki’s garden has just the right Japanese mix of burbling water, rocks and carefully tended shrubbery. Inside the ryokan rooms, the air is fragrant with the earthy scent of new tatami mats, and at night, futon mattresses and bean-filled pillows are carefully laid out in each room.

Taiwan has plenty of its own sights, sounds and tastes—the night markets of Taipei are famous for their endless variety of dumplings, noodle soups and sausages—yet many visitors don’t realize the island also offers some of the best Japanese food and service in all of Asia. It’s as authentic as any you’d find in Japan itself, but at far lower prices. Tsubaki might not have the same 300-year history and esteemed guest list as Tawaraya, a ryokan in Kyoto where princes of the Japanese royal family and foreign heads of state have stayed. But it’s just as comfortable, and at about $200 a night, including two meals, it’s one-fourth the price.

Much of what’s truly Japanese in Taiwan remains from its days as a colony of the Empire of the Sun. Japan occupied Taiwan and the nearby Pescadore Islands from 1895 to 1945, and during that time the Japanese turned Taiwan into one of Asia’s most modern and well-educated societies.

The Japanese built grand public buildings, turned the harbors of Kaohsiung and Keelung into key shipping ports, and laid a railroad that stretched along the western coast of the island. In Taipei, they tore down the old city walls and built a grid pattern for the city’s streets. Eventually, they extended primary education—in Japanese, of course—to ordinary Taiwanese, an effort to nurture literate workers.

After the Japanese defeat in World War II in 1945, the Chinese reclaimed the island. The ruling Kuomintang, or Nationalist Party, set about erasing most traces of Japanese rule and renaming streets after Chinese Nationalist heroes and principles. Chokushi Kaido was renamed Zhongshan Road (after an honorary name for Sun Yat-sen) and Sansen Doro became Zhongxiao Road (meaning “loyalty and filial piety”), according to Tai Pao-tsun, a history professor at Taiwan’s National Central University. They also destroyed Shinto shrines and banned Japanese publications.

But the rebranding of Taiwan, which continued after the Nationalists fled the Chinese mainland in 1949, wasn’t entirely successful. There are many Japanophiles living in Taiwan, and many places offering tourists in Taipei a less-expensive alternative to a trip to Japan. The roots of Japanese culture are still on display in Taipei, in a warren of alleys that locals call “Little Tokyo,” just south of Nanjing Road.

Today, these alleys are virtually indistinguishable from Tokyo’s Kabuki-cho nightlife district, lined with brightly lit Japanese signs advertising countless tiny hostess bars hidden behind doors not quite thick enough to contain the warbling of off-key karaoke. At the bar, you’re likely to find groups of middle-aged salarymen similar to those you’d see in Tokyo, except the hostesses—sitting beside them and keeping the drinks and conversation flowing—speak Japanese with a Taiwanese accent.

The Japanese-style grilled eel at the restaurant Fei-qian-wu is far better than its bar-alley location would suggest. The smoky flavor of the eel counters the slightly sweet basting sauce, just as you’d expect in Tokyo’s finest unagi (grilled eel) restaurants.

As at most casual eateries in Japan, the menu at Fei-qian-wu hangs on plaques around the walls (laminated menus in Chinese and English are also available). Order in Japanese or Mandarin—the restaurant was founded 35 years ago by a Japanese-Taiwanese family. You won’t even find the ubiquitous Taiwan-brand beer here. Instead ale drinkers are expected to order Kirin. A regular size unajyu (grilled eel over rice served in a lacquered bento box) and a Kirin costs about $6, a small fraction of the several thousand yen you’d expect to pay at an eel restaurant in Tokyo.

It’s not just the physical manifestations of Japanese culture that survive. Taiwan is one of the few places that can successfully duplicate the tipsy camaraderie of an izakaya eatery, where Japanese kick back and relax over drinks and small dishes of food after a hard day at the office.

At Wa-ko, the specialty is fresh seafood, and it offers an excellent variety of sashimi and grilled fish, served in small portions to go with drinks. Like most izakaya joints, the restaurant has two rooms: one with tables and chairs, the other with pillows or low-benches around tables in sunken recesses—old-style Japanese. On a recent visit, the traditionally styled room was full of Taiwanese customers. Owner Asato Satoshi, 55 years old, hails from the southern Japanese islands of Okinawa, and opened Wa-ko nearly two decades ago. The most popular dish is an Okinawan xia jiu cai—tofu with small fish and lemon on top. Be sure to try the roast chicken wings and squid with tarako, a kind of fish roe.

Oden is so much a part of Japanese food culture that a steaming pot of the stuff can be found right next to the cash register in many Japanese convenience stores. A simple, lightly flavored broth with root vegetables, egg, tofu and fish paste, oden dates back hundreds of years. Besides the modern convenience-store variety, oden traditionally was consumed at sidewalk stalls, along with the requisite glass of sake or beer, as a late-night snack. Taiwan sports its own homegrown version of oden bars—called heilun in Mandarin—that date back to its occupation-era days, and it has some traditional Japanese versions as well.

At Tian-quan, Darryl Wang, 32, the gregarious Taiwanese host, might not speak much Japanese but everything else about his street-corner oden bar is authentic, down to the address plaque from Tokyo’s trendy Shibuya district on the building’s wall. Both street-facing sides of the bar are completely open, leaving customers at the L-shaped counter exposed to the nighttime Taipei air. The feel is much like the now mostly-lost open-air oden stalls that dotted Tokyo’s streets in the immediate post-War period.

Mr. Wang spends most evenings dishing out bowls of oden to a crowd of steady local regulars, who return the favor by pouring him an occasional glass from their sake bottle. Belly up to the bar and try his fishcakes in soup and pick what you want—vegetables, meat or even fruit—to add in. Or just point to what the locals are having. Grilled chicken and fish also are available.

For dessert, head to the Sanmeido pastry shop in Taipei’s Tienmu area, in the shadow of the Mitsukoshi department store. The imposing proprietress, a Taiwanese and fluent-Japanese speaker named Tsai Yin, supervises from behind a glass counter showcasing her traditional Japanese sweets. In her 70s, Mrs. Tsai is old enough to have attended Japanese schools during the occupation, and, in fact, she speaks only Taiwanese (the local dialect) and Japanese—no Mandarin. Her Japanese husband taught her how to make the desserts, which include homemade dango (chewy rice-flour sweets skewered on a bamboo stick for easy eating) and the shop’s specialty, strawberry mochi (sweet rice cakes).
© Wsj

The controversy over e-cigarettes

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Sara Jacobs smokes a pack of Marlboro Gold a day, but she has an alternative when she’s at work or other public places where lighting up is banned.

Jacobs, 21, of Columbus, can dig into her purse for her electronic cigarette. The slim, battery-powered device resembles a traditional cigarette, but is marketed as tobacco-free. E-cigarettes contain an atomizer that turns liquid nicotine into a vapor that’s inhaled, giving the user the sensation of smoking.

“It’s very convenient,” said Jacobs, who said one nicotine cartridge lasts her about three days and gives a stronger buzz than a cigarette. “My husband doesn’t complain about my mouth tasting like a chimney.”

Jacobs, a buyer for the Garden, an adult store on N. High Street, said she purchased her InLife brand e-cigarette about a month ago, when her store started selling them.

She uses it at work when she’s too busy to take a smoke break and has tried it out at restaurants, bars and airports.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved e-cigarettes and has halted 17 shipments of them from coming into the country since March 1, said Karen Riley, an FDA spokeswoman. She said many of the blocked shipments arrived from China, where most e-cigarettes are made.


The FDA says e-cigarettes are “drug-delivery devices,” not tobacco products, and is evaluating them on a case-by-case basis, Riley said. She acknowledged that it’s possible that some overseas shipments still are passing through.

“Clearly, the mode of action here is the drug,” Riley said. “It’s nicotine, it’s addictive, and we have some real concerns about that.”

There was no mention of e-cigarettes, however, in legislation approved Thursday by the U.S. Senate and yesterday by the House that would give the FDA the power to regulate the content and marketing of cigarettes, Riley said. President Barack Obama, a smoker, has said he will sign the bill.

Meanwhile, e-cigarettes are being sold in Ohio and are untouched by the statewide smoking ban.

The ban does not include e-cigarettes because they do not burn tobacco or any other plant, said Kristopher Weiss, spokesman for the Ohio Department of Health. Still, he said, “We don’t see them here as a safe alternative to smoking.”

The Delaware General Health District recently issued an advisory about e-cigarettes, warning that they are neither safe nor healthy. Health officials plan to warn school administrators about them and will ask them to prohibit their use, said Jesse Carter, the health district’s spokesman.

“We’re very certain that school administrators wouldn’t approve of these things in schools, but what if a young person shows up with one and says, ‘I’m a smoker, and I’m trying to quit and this is my stop-smoking aid.’ ” Carter said. “We think it might be a situation where the policy needs to specifically say ‘electronic cigarettes,’ so there’s no doubt whatsoever.”

“If e-cigarettes become the next big thing, do I think children are going to try it?” said Shelly Kiser, director of advocacy for the American Lung Association in Ohio. “Most definitely.”

There are concerns for users of all ages, Kiser said. “There have been no scientific studies of these devices, and so we don’t know anything about them. We don’t know what it does to your system when you inhale evaporated nicotine. We know that the best thing for your lungs is clean air.”

Most e-cigarette users are smokers looking for an alternative to tobacco without the side effects, said Jack Leadbeater, chairman of the Electronic Cigarette Association and president and CEO of the NJOY brand of electronic cigarettes based in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Leadbeater said his company sells only to clients who are of legal smoking age.

“There are people out there that believe that the product is being marketed to children,” Leadbeater said. “Our company and companies within the association are certainly not doing that in any shape or form.”

Puff N Stuff, a shop along N. High Street, has opted against selling e-cigarettes for now. “We’ve stayed away from it because it doesn’t have the (FDA) approval,” said Joseph Allen, general manager. “We have no idea what it is. It’s a cartridge filled with whatever they tell you.”

The Joint, a smoke shop also on N. High Street owned by the same company as the Garden, has been selling them for about a month. A starter kit costs $139.99 and includes one unit, a charger and eight nicotine cartridges.

“People are more interested in the fact that you can smoke anywhere,” said Aaron Winchell, the Joint’s assistant manager. “That’s a plus to having one of those.”
Source: Dispatch

Landmark Cigarette Bill

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

As the New York Times reports this morning, a bill allowing the Food and Drug Administration to “impose potentially strict new controls” on the tobacco industry has made it through the Senate. As the House had already passed a similar bill back in April, it seems certain that the measure will reach President Barack Obama’s desk — a measure he says he will sign into law.

The Times quotes Clifford E. Douglas, from the University of Michigan’s Tobacco Research Network as saying, “This is a historic step changing the nature of tobacco in society forever.” And yet, a troubling and underreported aspect of this bill concerns a matter that seems rooted in past practices.

At issue is a bit of legislative horse-trading that the Altria Group — parent company of tobacco industry giant Philip Morris — managed as the bill was being negotiated, and having won their point, agreed to the measure, ensuring its success. Today’s Times piece makes glancing mention of it:

But the law would give the F.D.A. power to set standards that could reduce nicotine content and regulate chemicals in cigarette smoke.

The law also bans most tobacco flavorings, which are considered a lure to first-time smokers. Menthol was deferred to later studies.

Health advocates predict that F.D.A. standards could eventually reduce some of the 60 carcinogens and 4,000 toxins in cigarette smoke, or make it taste so bad it deters users.

As it turns out, this would be one of those occasions when the New York Times might consider reading their own paper. Stephanie Saul, reporting last year, wrote a pair of articles that take on this matter head on.

‘Cigarette Bill Treats Menthol With Leniency,’ May 13, 2008:

Some public health experts are questioning why menthol, the most widely used cigarette flavoring and the most popular cigarette choice of African-American smokers, is receiving special protection as Congress tries to regulate tobacco for the first time.
The legislation, which would give the Food and Drug Administration the power to oversee tobacco products, would try to reduce smoking’s allure to young people by banning most flavored cigarettes, including clove and cinnamon.

But those new strictures would exempt menthol — even though menthol masks the harsh taste of cigarettes for beginners and may make it harder for the addicted to kick the smoking habit. For years, public health authorities have worried that menthol might be a factor in high cancer rates in African-Americans.

The reason menthol is seen as politically off limits, despite those concerns, is that mentholated brands are so crucial to the American cigarette industry. They make up more than one-fourth of the $70 billion American cigarette market and are becoming increasingly important to the industry leader, Philip Morris USA, without whose lobbying support the legislation might have no chance of passage.

“I would have been in favor of banning menthol,” said Senator Judd Gregg, Republican of New Hampshire, who supports the bill. “But as a practical matter that simply wasn’t doable.”

Right. No matter the effect on public health, you wouldn’t want to make Perfect the Enemy of Good, right? Despairingly, this is the attitude echoed by William Robinson, the head of the National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, who, in Saul’s article, says: “The bottom line is we want the legislation…But we want to reserve the right to address this issue at some critical point because of the percentage of people of African descent who use mentholated products.”

And it is a critical point, that Saul touched on in July’s New York Times, in an article titled “Black Caucus Seeks Limits on Menthol Cigarettes”:

Menthol is a racially charged additive, in part because of the tobacco industry’s heavy marketing of mentholated cigarettes to African-Americans since the 1950s. The flavor helps to mask the harsh taste of cigarettes and may make it easier to start smoking,
Menthol brands account for 28 percent of the $70 billion American cigarette market. While only 25 percent of white smokers choose menthol cigarettes, an estimated 75 percent of African-American smokers do.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health officials have raised concerns about the possibility that menthol cigarettes might increase tobacco addiction and possibly cancer rates among black smokers.

There is also evidence that some menthol brands, including Newport, contain among the highest level of nicotine of leading cigarettes. Some experts believe that higher nicotine levels increase the addictiveness of cigarettes.

And in July, despite the fact that tobacco company Lorillard is depicted as the company that “would stand to lose the most from a ban on menthol cigarettes,” and the most aggressive opponent to the prospect of such a ban, Saul makes special note of who the real heavy hitter in the room is:

Some lawmakers have said the decision to exempt menthol from the bill’s flavorings ban was intended to win support for the legislation from Philip Morris, the country’s dominant tobacco company, whose Marlboro Menthol is the second-leading menthol brand.

Well, what is the Times saying about the company today?

Publicly, Altria pushed the legislation for “the greater predictability and stability we think it will bring to the tobacco industry,” as a spokesman, Brendan J. McCormick, said this week.
But the impulse dates to the 1990s, when according to Philip Morris documents released during lawsuits, the company decided to remake its image as a responsible corporate citizen. Part of that strategy was to advocate legislation to reduce the risks in cigarettes, and avoid smoking’s being outlawed outright.

Moreover, as the industry’s richest company, with profits last year of more than $3 billion, Altria, based in Richmond, Va., has built an extensive scientific research operation. It may thus be the company best equipped to deal with the F.D.A.’s new review process for new, ostensibly safer tobacco products.

This strikes me as a fig-leaf take on the matter. The very fact that Altria/Philip Morris pushed to get a menthol ban out of the legislation gives the lie to the idea that they are bent on being a “responsible corporate citizen” willing to “reduce the risks” in cigarettes. Their lobbying on behalf of menthol clearly indicates neither is of a particular concern. Chances are, however, that Philip Morris just managed to keep their true motivations hidden from the Times.

Or, maybe not.

As Altria’s competitors have repeatedly argued in opposing the legislation, Altria stands to retain more market share if the advertising crackdown makes it harder for other companies to improve their sales standing.

Oh, well. At least the black community can count on the Congress to revisit the issue, and perhaps decide at a later date that menthol should be treated like any other tobacco flavoring, right?

Actually, it’s not even clear that the bill, as passed, will survive! Check out how Altria/Philip Morris — good corporate citizen and risk reducer — looms over a potential threat to the bill they so kindly helped to shepherd through.

Yet, even Altria said Thursday the legislation, while “an important step forward,” was “not perfect.” The Association of National Advertisers says the act’s “unprecedentedly broad advertising restrictions” violate First Amendment protections for commercial speech. Legal experts say a court challenge on that ground is virtually certain.

The important point is this, having won the day, what do you think the chances are that our good corporate citizen, Altria/Philip Morris, will actually voluntarily give up menthol additives — or even cotton to the issue being revisited — just to do right by the black community? If Congressional compromise and the Times‘ short memory are any indication, they aren’t very high.

© Huffingtonpost

Promoted Tobacco and Cigarettes

Friday, June 12th, 2009

Despite its stated mission, “To promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health,” the American Medical Association (AMA) has taken many missteps in protecting the health of the American people. One of the most striking examples is the AMA’s long-term relationship with the tobacco industry.

Both the AMA and individual doctors sided with big tobacco for decades after the deleterious effects of smoking were proven. Medical historians have tracked this relationship in great detail, examining internal documents from tobacco companies and their legal counsel and public relations advisers. The overarching theme of big tobacco’s efforts was to keep alive the appearance of a “debate” or “controversy” of the health effects of cigarette smoking.

The first research to make a statistical correlation between cancer and smoking was published in 1930 in Cologne, Germany. In 1938, Dr. Raymond Pearl of Johns Hopkins University reported that smokers do not live as long as non-smokers. The tobacco industry dismissed these early findings as anecdotal — but at the same time recruited doctors to endorse cigarettes.



JAMA kicks off two decades of cigarette advertising
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published its first cigarette advertisement in 1933, stating that it had done so only “after careful consideration of the extent to which cigarettes were used by physicians in practice.” These advertisements continued for 20 years. The same year, Chesterfield began running ads in the New York State Journal of Medicine, with the claim that its cigarettes were “Just as pure as the water you drink… and practically untouched by human hands.”

In medical journals and in the popular media, one of the most infamous cigarette advertising slogans was associated with the Camel brand: “More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.” The campaign began in 1946 and ran for eight years in magazines and on the radio. The ads included this message:

“Family physicians, surgeons, diagnosticians, nose and throat specialists, doctors in every branch of medicine… a total of 113,597 doctors… were asked the question: ‘What cigarette do you smoke?’ And more of them named Camel as their smoke than any other cigarette! Three independent research groups found this to be a fact. You see, doctors too smoke for pleasure. That full Camel flavor is just as appealing to a doctor’s taste as to yours… that marvelous Camel mildness means just as much to his throat as to yours.”

Big Tobacco’s suppression of scientific evidence
At the same time that JAMA ran cigarette ads, it published in 1950 the first major study to causally link smoking to lung cancer. Morton Levin, then director of Cancer Control for the New York State Department of Health, surveyed patients in Buffalo, N.Y., from 1938 to 1950 and found that smokers were twice as likely to develop lung cancer as non-smokers.
Source: Naturalnews